Appeal No. 2000-0697 Application No. 09/049938 second catalyst. This must be done by prior art evidence or compelling scientific reasoning, not conclusory remarks. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is reversed. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) PETER F. KRATZ ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LINDA R. POTEATE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007