Appeal No. 2000-0834 Application No. 08/798,679 characterized in that the layer comprises a dopant capable, by a redox reaction of changing the oxidation state of the organic conjugated compound, the material is soluble, the organic conjugated compound is a polymer or an oligomer, and the electroconductivity of the layer in a written state is permanently lower than in an unwritten state. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Marrocco, III (Marrocco) 4,945,257 Jul. 31, 1990 Atkins EP 0,115,191 Aug. 08, 1984 Claims 2 through 4 and 6 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Marrocco in view of Atkins. Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 23, mailed January 11, 2000) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's Brief (Paper No. 22, filed November 18, 1999) and Reply Brief (Paper No. 24, filed March 13, 2000) for appellant's arguments thereagainst. OPINION We have carefully considered the claims, the applied prior art references, and the respective positions articulated by appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 2 through 4 and 6 through 9. Regarding sole independent claim 9, the examiner asserts (Answer, page 3) that "Marrocco teaches an organic material based 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007