The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOSEPH E. PROVINO, JAMES D. DAVIS, and MARC S. DYE ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0883 Application No. 08/672,528 ____________ HEARD: June 11, 2002 ____________ Before RUGGIERO, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 45, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellants’ invention relates to a communication mechanism for and method of passing information within an operating system environment between computer-implemented applications running in the environment that employ different memory addressing modes. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 1. A communication mechanism for passing information within an operating system environment between computer-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007