Ex Parte NIELSEN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-0962                                                        
          Application 08/885,801                                                      


          13-15, 18-22 and 26.                                                        
          The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                            
          apparatus for automatically capturing network addresses, such as            
          Internet addresses, from live broadcast video such as television.           
          Representative claim 20 is reproduced as follows:                           
          20.  A system for retrieving information, comprising:                       
               a.   a network;                                                        
               b.   at least one server connected to said network having              
          information stored thereon; and                                             
               c.   computer apparatus, connected to said network,                    
          configured to receive an image from a video signal, to                      
          automatically identify a network address contained in said image            
          and to use said address to retrieve information from a server               
          over said network.                                                          
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Fitzpatrick et al. (Fitzpatrick)   5,262,860     Nov. 16, 1993              
          Hidary et al. (Hidary)             5,774,664     June 30, 1998              
          (filed Mar. 25, 1996)                                                       
          Claims 2, 4, 8, 13-15 and 18-22 stand rejected under 35                     
          U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of                   
          Fitzpatrick.  Claims 3, 5, 9-11 and 26 stand rejected under 35              
          U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers               
          Fitzpatrick and Hidary.                                                     
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007