Ex Parte NIELSEN - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0962                                                        
          Application 08/885,801                                                      


          respective details thereof.                                                 
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the evidence            
          of anticipation and obviousness relied upon by the examiner as              
          support for the rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed and                
          taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, the                     
          appellant’s arguments set forth in the briefs along with the                
          examiner’s rationale in support of the rejections and arguments             
          in rebuttal set forth in the examiner’s answer.                             
          It is our view, after consideration of the record before                    
          us, that the evidence relied upon supports each of the rejections           
          made by the examiner.  Accordingly, we affirm.                              
          We consider first the rejection of claims 2, 4, 8, 13-15                    
          and 18-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the              
          disclosure of Fitzpatrick.  Anticipation is established only when           
          a single prior art reference discloses, expressly or under the              
          principles of inherency, each and every element of a claimed                
          invention as well as disclosing structure which is capable of               
          performing the recited functional limitations.  RCA Corp. v.                
          Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ           
          385, 388 (Fed. Cir.); cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228 (1984); W.L.           

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007