The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ANTONIN HOLY,
HANA DVORAKOVA,
ERIK D. A. DE CLERCQ,
JAN M. R. BALZARINI
__________
Appeal No. 2000-1024
Application No. 08/379,551
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1, 4, 6, 8, 12-19, 45-48, 55, 63, 65, 70, 72, 73, 75, 85,
91, 93 and 94.1 Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal, and
reads as follows:
1 According to the Examiner’s Answer, claims 49-54, 56-62, 64 and 79 are free
of the prior art, with Claim 79 being objected to, and thus these claims are not
subject to the instant appeal. See Examiner’s Answer, page 2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007