Appeal No. 2000-1024 Page 12
Application No. 08/379,551
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1, 4, 6, 8, 45-48, 55, 63, 65, 70, 72, 73, 75, 85, 91,
93 and 94 over the combination of Holy (US), Webb (EP or US), Yu (EP or US),
Starrett, Holy (EP) and Karrer is reversed. For the same reasons, the
obviousness-type double patenting rejections over the ’716 patent and the ’510
patent as combined with Yu (EP or US), Holy (EP), Starrett and Karrer, and the
rejection of claims 12-19 over the combination of Holy (EP), Webb (EP or US),
Vemishetti, Alexander, Yu (US or EP) and the Merck Index, are also reversed.
Finally, the provisional rejection of claims 1, 4, 6, 70, 72, 85, 91, 93 and 94 over
the claims of co-pending application No. 07/925,610 is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007