The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BERNARD RAYMOND PIERRE ____________ Appeal No. 2000-1028 Application No. 08/950,522 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 18 through 27, which are the only claims remaining in this application (see the Brief, page 2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellant, the invention is directed to a method of coating sheets by sequentially conveying a plurality of sheets along a sheet path with the machine direction of thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007