Appeal No. 2000-1028
Application No. 08/950,522
above in Ritter. Similarly, Thierstein was applied against claim
24 by the examiner for the teaching of a particular overlapping
sequence (Answer, pages 6-7) and thus also does not remedy the
deficiency noted above in Ritter. Accordingly, we reverse both
of the examiner’s rejections under section 103(a).
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
Other Issues
Upon the return of this application to the jurisdiction of
the examiner, the examiner and appellant should consider the
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007