Ex parte CALLAGHAN et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     

                                                            Paper No. 18              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   _____________                                      
                             Ex parte IAN C. CALLAGHAN,                               
                                   GRACE ABAMBA,                                      
                                  ROBERT KINSLEY,                                     
                              TIMOTHY I. MOODYCLIFFE,                                 
                                        and                                           
                                 RICHARD P. WOODBURY                                  
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2000-1038                                  
                             Application No. 08/888,042                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before PAK, TIMM, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                  
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 23, 24, 27 and                
          28, which are all of the claims pending in the above-                       
          identified application.                                                     







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007