Appeal No. 2000-1038 Application No. 08/888,042 Claim 23 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows: 23. A method for cleaning limescale from a surface which comprises applying a biodegradable aqueous acid cleaning composition, said composition comprising iminodiacetic acid; from 0.2 weight percent to 6 weight percent based on the total weight of said composition of a thickener selected from the group consisting of biopolymers, cross-linked polyacrylates, modified polyacrylates, and mixtures thereof; and an enzyme mixture, wherein said mixture comprises a plurality of enzymes selected from the group consisting of carbohydrase enzymes, gluconase enzymes and mixtures thereof; wherein said composition has a pH of 0.1-5. The sole prior art reference relied upon by the examiner is: Carpenter et al. (Carpenter) 5,238,843 Aug. 24, 1993 Claims 23, 24, 27, and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the disclosure of Carpenter.1 We have carefully evaluated the claims, specification, 1The examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 23, 24, 27, and 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, set forth in the final Office action dated November 17, 1998. See Answer, page 3. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007