Ex parte COLLINS et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-1058                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/673,972                                                  


          Boswell                       4,810,935                Mar. 07,             
          1989                                                                        
          Campbell et al. (Campbell)    4,990,229                Feb. 05,             
          1991                                                                        
          Coburn, “Increasing the Etch Rate ratio of SiO /Si in                       
                                                        2                             
          Fluorocarbon Plasma Etching,” IBM Technical Disclosure                      
          Bulletin, Vol. 19, No. 10, March, 1977.                                     

               Claims 10-18 and 21-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                
          103 as being unpatentable over either Coburn or Douglas.                    
          Claims 10-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                  
          unpatentable over either Coburn or Douglas each in view of                  
          Campbell or Boswell, and Tsuchimoto.                                        
               We refer to appellants’ brief and the answer for a                     
          complete exposition of the opposing viewpoints of appellants                
          and the examiner concerning the rejections before us.                       
                                       OPINION                                        
               Upon careful review of the entire record including the                 
          respective positions advanced by appellants and the examiner,               
          we find ourselves in agreement with appellants since the                    
          examiner has failed to carry the burden of establishing a                   
          prima facie case of obviousness.  See In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d               
          1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992); In re                    
          Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1471-1472, 223 USPQ 785, 787-788                   








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007