The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JING GUI, BRUNO J. MARCHON,
DALLAS W. MEYER and PETER SEGAR
____________
Appeal No. 2000-1101
Application No. 08/702,325
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 3, 5
to 17, 19, 29 and 30. Claims 24 to 28 have been allowed. Claims 4, 18 and 20 to 23
have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007