Appeal No. 2000-1101 Page 6 Application No. 08/702,325 Since the claimed subject matter is not suggested by the applied prior art for the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 3, 5 to 17, 19, 29 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 3, 5 to 17, 19, 29 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOHN P. McQUADE ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JEFFREY V. NASE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 4(...continued) lubricant by excluding fractions of low molecular weight as taught by Ohnuki necessarily results in also excluding fractions of high molecular weight.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007