Ex Parte GUI et al - Page 6




                 Appeal No. 2000-1101                                                                                      Page 6                     
                 Application No. 08/702,325                                                                                                           


                          Since the claimed subject matter is not suggested by the applied prior art for the                                          
                 reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 3, 5 to 17, 19,                                          
                 29 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                                         


                                                                 CONCLUSION                                                                           
                          To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 3, 5 to 17, 19,                                            
                 29 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                                         
                                                                  REVERSED                                                                            





                                            CHARLES E. FRANKFORT                                 )                                                    
                                            Administrative Patent Judge                          )                                                    
                                                                                                 )                                                    
                                                                                                 )                                                    
                                                                                                 )                                                    
                                                                                                 ) BOARD OF PATENT                                    
                                            JOHN P. McQUADE                                      )         APPEALS                                    
                                            Administrative Patent Judge                          )             AND                                    
                                                                                                 )  INTERFERENCES                                     
                                                                                                 )                                                    
                                                                                                 )                                                    
                                                                                                 )                                                    
                                            JEFFREY V. NASE                                      )                                                    
                                            Administrative Patent Judge                          )                                                    

                          4(...continued)                                                                                                             
                 lubricant by excluding fractions of low molecular weight as taught by Ohnuki necessarily results in also                             
                 excluding fractions of high molecular weight.                                                                                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007