Appeal No. 2000-1120
Application 09/095,205
Additionally, appellants' arguments do not convince us that
the substitution as proposed by the examiner alters the
principles of operation of each of the primary references, or
that the combination would render each of the primary references
being modified unsatisfactory for its intended purpose, for the
reasons discussed above.
In view of the above, we determine that the examiner has set
forth a prima facie case of obviousness and we hereby affirm each
of the rejections of record.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
)
Edward C. Kimlin )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Peter F. Kratz ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Beverly A. Pawlikowski )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BAP/cam
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007