Ex Parte GROTH et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     

                                                            Paper No. 17              

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                    
                                     _____________                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                        
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     _____________                                    
                                 Ex parte STEFAN GROTH,                               
                                    JOSEF PEDAIN,                                     
                                   LUTZ SCHMALSTIEG,                                  
                                         and                                          
                                 DETLEF-INGO SCHÜTZE                                  
                                     _____________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 2000-1155                                 
                                Application No. 08/908,655                            
                                    ______________                                    
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                    _______________                                   

          Before GARRIS, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of            
          claims 2-4 and 6-13 which are of the claims remaining in the                
          application.                                                                
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a reactive                     
          composition comprising (1) an NCO prepolymer based on an                    
          aliphatic and/or cycloaliphatic polyisocyanate and having an NCO            
          content of 2 to 4 wt.% and a monomeric polyisocyanate content of            









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007