Appeal No. 2000-1155
Application No. 08/908,655
In summary, the argument and evidence before us on this
appeal weigh most heavily in favor of an obviousness conclusion.
We hereby sustain, therefore, the examiner’s Section 103
rejection of all appealed claims as being unpatentable over Quay.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES F. WARREN ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BRG:hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007