Ex Parte FU et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-1164                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/899,176                                                  

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants' invention relates to a method for cleaning                 
          wafers with ionized water.  The ionized water is obtained by                
          adding ions to a deionized (DI) water, that is, a regular DI                
          water is doped with ions such as OH-, F-, Cl-, NH4- and H+.  See              
          page 7, line 10 through page 8, line 10 of appellants’                      
          specification.  Claims 8, 10 and 13 are reproduced below.                   
                    8.  A method for cleaning a wafer in a scrubber                   
               comprising the steps of:                                               
                    providing a quantity of deionized water to a scrubber,            
                    doping said quantity of deionized water with at least             
               one species of ions such that the resistivity of the water             
               is less than 18x106 Ohm-cm, and                                        
                    scrubbing a surface of said wafer with said doped                 
               deionized water.                                                       
                    10.  A method according to claim 8, wherein said at               
               least one species of ions is added to said quantity of                 
               deionized water by adding carboxylic acid at a mixing ratio            
               of not smaller than 1:100 (acid/water).                                
                    13.  A method according to claim 8, wherein said doped            
               deionized water contacting said wafer under a pressure of              
               not less than 1000 psi.                                                
               In addition to alleged admitted prior art in appellants’               
          specification (Background of the Invention, especially page 2,              
          lines 10-13),2 the prior art references of record relied upon by            
          the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                          


               2 See answer, page 7.                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007