The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL A. PERKS
____________
Appeal No. 2000-1238
Application 08/566,638
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MARTIN, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1-14 over prior art.1 We reverse.
1 As noted in the "Status of Amendments After Final"
section in Appellant's brief (at 3), which section the examiner
has indicated is correct (Answer at 1), an amendment (Paper No.
20) was filed on February 26, 1999, canceling claims 15-18. This
amendment has not yet been formally entered.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007