Appeal No. 2000-1279
Application No. 09/053,025
appropriately, appellant points out that the examiner’s
contention is not supported by a reference (reply brief, page
2) and that the examiner has used “broadbrush general
statements” (reply brief, page 4) to imply that the subject
matter of the claims on appeal would have been obvious. At
least for the reasons set forth above, the respective
rejections before us cannot be sustained.
In summary, this panel of the board has not sustained
each of the rejections on appeal.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007