The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 28 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte LONNIE G. JOHNSON _____________ Appeal No. 2000-1327 Application No. 08/402,624 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Lonnie G. Johnson appeals from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-18, all the claims pending in the application. By way of background, this is the second appeal taken by appellant from the examiner’s final rejection of the above claims. In Appeal No. 97-0277, this merits panel of the Board affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, and pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) entered a new ground ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007