Ex Parte AOKI - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2000-1371                                                                                               
               Application No. 08/867,810                                                                                         


                                                       BACKGROUND                                                                 
                      The appellant's invention relates to a nozzle plate and a manufacturing process                             
               thereof.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary                             
               claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                                                
                      1.      A nozzle plate for an ink jet head provided with nozzle orifices                                    
                      though which ink is to be ejected,                                                                          
                              wherein the nozzle orifices are formed in the nozzle plate by an                                    
                      excimer laser device with a working lens which has a numerical aperture                                     
                      (NA) set to 0.13 or more and 0.35 or less,                                                                  
                              wherein the range of the numerical aperture is determined based                                     
                      on size of a round portion produced around the nozzle orifice and a focal                                   
                      depth of an optical system used in the excimer laser device,                                                
                              and wherein the value 0.13 is selected so that an amount of the                                     
                      round portion becomes lower than a predetermined amount, and the                                            
                      value 0.35 is selected so that the nozzle plate and the working lens are                                    
                      easily positioned when the nozzle orifices are formed by the excimer laser                                  
                      device.                                                                                                     

                      The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                             
               appealed claims are:                                                                                               
               Watanabe et al. (Watanabe)            5,208,604                             May  4, 1993                           
               Smith et al. (Smith)                  5,538,817                             Jul. 23, 1996                          
               Hirukawa et al. (Hirukawa)         5,703,675                         Dec. 30, 1997                                 

                      Claims 1, 2, 6, 8-11 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                
               unpatentable over Smith.  Claims 3-5 and 12-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                      


                                                                2                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007