Ex Parte CHAPMAN et al - Page 6



         Appeal No. 2000-1433                                                       
         Application No. 09/027,074                                                 

              In summary, the Chapman and Bailey references fail to                 
         establish a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the            
         optical recording element defined by the appealed claims.  For             
         this reason and because the Takahashi and Ichikawa references              
         have not been relied upon by the examiner for supplying the above          
         discussed deficiencies of Chapman and Bailey, we cannot sustain            
         either of the Section 103 rejections advanced on this appeal.              
              The decision of the examiner is reversed.                             

                                      REVERSED                                      
                                                                                   
                                                                                  
         BRADLEY R. GARRIS            )                                             
                   Administrative Patent Judge  )                                   
                                                 )                                  
                                                 )                                  
                                                 )   BOARD OF PATENT                
                   THOMAS A. WALTZ              )     APPEALS AND                   
                   Administrative Patent Judge  )    INTERFERENCES                  
                                                 )                                  
                                                 )                                  
                                                 )                                  
                   PETER F. KRATZ               )                                   
                   Administrative Patent Judge  )                                   










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007