Appeal No. 2000-1502 Page 3
Application No. 08/643,597
designated as being defective and displayed on the
monitor; and
an overlay frame wherein the associated inspection
area of the defect of the multi-colored printed
image is designated on the monitor by said overlay
frame.
The prior art applied by the examiner in rejecting the
claims follows:
Zingher et al. (“Zingher”) 5,014,618 May 14, 1991
Hashimoto et al. (“Hashimoto”) 5,187,376 Feb. 16, 1993
Zabele 5,712,921 Jan. 27, 1998
(effectively filed June 17,
1993).
Claims 1, 2, and 5-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as obvious over Zabele in view of Zingher. Claims 3, 4, and 8
stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Zabele in view
of Zingher further in view of Hashimoto.
OPINION
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007