Ex parte HUBER et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2000-1502                                       Page 5           
          Application No. 08/643,597                                                  


          vacuum, but are part of and are read in light of the                        
          specification.”  Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. Kinkead Indus., Inc.,                 
          810 F.2d 1113, 1116, 1 USPQ2d 1563, 1566 (Fed. Cir.                         
          1987)(citing Hybritech Inc. v. Monoclonal Anti-bodies, Inc.,                
          802 F.2d 1367, 1385, 231 USPQ 81, 94-95 (Fed. Cir. 1986); In                
          re Mattison, 509 F.2d 563, 565, 184 USPQ 484, 486 (CCPA                     
          1975)).                                                                     


               Here, independent claim 1 specifies in pertinent part the              
          following limitations: "an overlay frame wherein the                        
          associated inspection area of the defect of the multi-colored               
          printed image is designated on the monitor by said overlay                  
          frame."  Figure 1 of the specification shows that a frame 14                
          is used to enclose a specific inspection area 13 of an overall              
          image displayed on a monitor 18 to designate that the area                  
          contains a defect.  Reading the independent claim in light of               
          the specification, the limitations require inter alia                       
          designating a defect in an overall image displayed on a                     
          monitor by framing the specific portion of the image that                   
          contains the defect.                                                        








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007