Ex Parte LEMELSON et al - Page 14



          Appeal No. 2000-1511                                                        
          Application 08/671,853                                                      

          We do not need to consider the remaining dependent claims                   
          because appellants have not argued these claims and/or because              
          the additionally applied prior art does not overcome the                    
          deficiencies noted above in the main combination of Butsuen and             
          Ishikawa.  These remaining claims, therefore, stand or fall with            
          the claims from which they depend.                                          
          In summary, the rejection of all appealed claims under                      
          the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is not sustained.  The               
          rejection of all appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is not               
          sustained with respect to claims 100-113, 115-122, 125-128, 134             
          and 139-161, but is sustained with respect to claims 129-132, 135           
          and 136.  Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting                 
          claims 100-113, 115-122, 125-132, 134-136 and 139-161 is                    
          affirmed-in-part.                                                           










                                         14                                           




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007