The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SUNG-HYUN KIM ____________ Appeal No. 2000-1520 Application No. 08/768,715 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection1 of claims 1-15, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellant's invention relates to a method of detecting a caller identification (ID) provided with a ring signal, and 1 1 An amendment (Paper No. 10, filed October 8, 1998) submitted subsequent to the final rejection has been entered by the examiner (Paper No. 12, mailed October 22, 1998).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007