Ex Parte TIEDEMANN et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1546                                                        
          Application 08/588,149                                                      


          Representative claim 16 is reproduced as follows:                           
               16.  A method for reducing interference in a                           
          communication channel used by at least one of a plurality of                
          first transceivers to initiate communication with a second                  
          transceiver, said method comprising the steps of:                           
               transmitting from said at least one first transceiver an               
          access probe at a first level of power, said first level of power           
          being determined on the basis of signal power received from said            
          second transceiver;                                                         
               determining whether said access probe has been received                
          at said second transceiver; and                                             
               retransmitting said access probe from said at least one                
          first transceiver at a level of power greater than said first               
          level of power until said access probe is received at said second           
          transceiver.                                                                
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Gilhousen et al. (Gilhousen)     5,416,797        May  16, 1995             
          (filed on Jun. 25, 1990)                                                    
          Seki et al. (Seki)             JP 02-256331       Oct. 17, 1990             
          Imamura et al. (Imamura)       JP 03-231523       Oct. 15, 1991             
          Claims 16-18, 22, 24, 32, 36-38 and 40 stand rejected                       
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure             
          of Imamura.  Claims 19-21, 23, 25-31 and 39 stand rejected under            
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of                 
          Imamura and Gilhousen.  Claims 33-35 and 41 stand rejected under            













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007