Appeal No. 2000-1546
Application 08/588,149
examiner’s answer [page 4].
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the evidence
of anticipation and obviousness relied upon by the examiner as
support for the rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and
taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, the
appellants’ arguments set forth in the briefs along with the
examiner’s rationale in support of the rejections and arguments
in rebuttal set forth in the examiner’s answer.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before
us, that the evidence relied upon supports the rejections as set
forth by the examiner. Accordingly, we affirm.
Appellants indicated in the main appeal brief that the
claims on appeal would stand or fall together as a single group
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007