The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAVID CLARK POLLOCK
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-1639
Application No. 08/923,449
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
David Clark Pollack appeals from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 2 and 8-22 and 24-37.1 Claims 3-7 have
been canceled.
1Appellant states on page 1 of the brief that the finally
rejected claims are “claims 1, 2, 8-22 and 24-37 (claim 23 having
erroneously not been submitted).” The appendix of claims on
appeal attached to appellant’s brief follows this claim
numbering. In accordance with 37 CFR § 1.126, claims 24-37
should be renumbered claims 23-36, respectively. In this
decision, in order to avoid confusion, we will follow the claim
numbering found in the aforementioned appendix of claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007