The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS M. SIEP and RONALD E. STAFFORD ____________ Appeal No. 2000-1699 Application No. 08/706,123 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 3, 4, 6-9, 11, 12, 14-16 and 20-27, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application. An amendment after final rejection was filed on April 2, 1999 and was entered by the examiner.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007