Ex parte SIEP et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1699                                                        
          Application No. 08/706,123                                                  


          The disclosed invention pertains to a wireless network                      
          for communicating between processing devices.                               


          Representative claim 25 is reproduced as follows:                           
               25. A wireless network comprising:                                     
               a master processing device for generating information and              
          broadcasting said information through wireless transmission of              
          signals;                                                                    
               a plurality of individually identifiable and addressable               
          client processing devices having circuitry for receiving said               
          information from said master processing device and transmitting             
          other information to said master processing device, said master             
          processing device broadcasting data to all of said client                   
          processing devices and selecting one and only one of said client            
          processing devices to acknowledge receipt of each bit of data               
          said master processing device broadcasts to all of said client              
          processing devices.                                                         
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Tejima et al. (Tejima)        4,809,268          Feb. 28, 1989              
          The admitted prior art.                                                     
          Claims 25, 27, 3, 4, 6-9 and 20-24 stand rejected under                     
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of                
          Tejima.  Claims 26, 11, 12 and 14-16 stand rejected under 35                
          U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers               
          Tejima in view of the admitted prior art.                                   


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007