Ex parte MIYAZAWA et al. - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2000-1713                                                    
         Application 09/025,551                                                  


              controlling a shape of said reference plane to a planar            
         shape by deforming the workpiece; and then                              
              removing material constituting the workpiece from the              
         surface of the workpiece toward said reference plane.                   
         [emphasis added]                                                        
              7.  A workpiece surface processing method as claimed in            
         claim 1, wherein said workpiece comprises two semiconductor             
         wafers which are bonded to each other.                                  

              8.  A semiconductor thin layer forming method comprising           
         the steps of:                                                           
              bonding the surface of a first semiconductor wafer and             
         the surface of a second semiconductor wafer to each other to            
         form a composite;                                                       
              controlling a shape of a reference plane which is set in           
         one of said first semiconductor wafer and said second                   
         semiconductor wafer to have a planar shape by deforming the             
         composite; and then                                                     
              removing said first semiconductor wafer from the back              
         surface of said first semiconductor wafer toward said                   
         reference plane to form a semiconductor thin layer from the             
         residual first semiconductor wafer. [emphasis added]                    
              In support of the rejections, the examiner relies upon             
         the following prior art:                                                
         Yamaki et al. (Yamaki)       4,962,056     Oct.  9, 1990                
         Miller                     5,529,051     June 25, 1996                
              Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being           
         unpatentable over Miller.                                               
              Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being             
         unpatentable over Miller in view of Yamaki.                             
                                        2                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007