Ex Parte SAMARITANI et al - Page 5




                        15. To understand Tables 10-15, one must first                                   
            appreciate Table 7, which describes four (4) compositions, which                             
            we designate as 1 through 4:                                                                 
            1.  r-hCG/5000/S01  contains 10000 units r-hCG and 102.6 units sucrose                       
            2.  r-hCG/5000/M01  contains 10000 units r-hCG and  54.6 units mannitol                      
            3.  r-hCG/10000/S01 contains 20000 units r-hCG and 102.6 units sucrose                       
            4.  r-hCG/10000/M01 contains 20000 units r-hCG and  54.6 units mannitol5                     

                        16. One immediately notes that the ratio of sucrose to                           
            r-hCG is slightly less than twice the ratio of mannitol to r-hCG                             
            [102.6/10000 = 0.0.01026 whereas 54.6/10000 = 0.00546 for                                    
            Compositions 1 and 2, respectively, and 102.6/20000 = 0.00513 and                            
            54.6/20000 = 0.00273 for Compositions 3 and 4, respectively].                                
                        17. According to the specification, Tables 10 and 11                             
            report the purity determined by HPSEC6 for 5,000 and 10,000 IU                               
            strength respectively.  The data is said to show that even after                             
            three weeks at 50°C, the purity is higher in the formulations                                
            containing mannitol compared to the formulations containing                                  
            sucrose (specification, page 4, lines 13-16).                                                



               In Table 7, the formulation is identified as "r-hCG/1000/M01" (emphasis                   
            added).  Based on other Tables we discuss, infra, we suspect the 1000 is a                   
            typographical error and that applicants meant 10000.  Accordingly, we use 10000              
            and not 1000.                                                                                
               We are told in the specification that purity was measured by HPSEC                        
            analyses using standard conditions set out in the specification.  However,                   
            there is no testimony, for example, in the form of a Rule 132 declaration,                   
            which explains (a) the reason why the test is being used and why the data is                 
            being relied upon; (b) how the test is performed; (c) how the data is generated              
            using the test; (d) how the data is used to determine a value; (e) the                       
            acknowledged accuracy of the test; and (f) any other information which would                 
            aid the USPTO, including the board, in understanding the significance of the                 
            test or data.  Hence, on this record, we do not know what weight, if any,                    
            should be assigned to HPSEC tests and data generated therefrom.                              

                                                 - 5 -                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007