Appeal No. 2000-1783 Page 8 Application No. 08/817,719 a non-IgE related disorder.@ Brief, page 7. Further, appellant argues that A[t]here is no evidence in the literature to suggest that antigen-specific IgE plays any role in either triggering or perpetuating autoimmunity.@ Id., page 8. On this record, we agree with appellant that A[t]he use of antibodies to block [antigen]-induced IgE production, therefore, has no relevance whatsoever to the claimed method.@ Id. Bansal describes elevated levels of sCD23 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and suggests that A[i]t is possible that features of autoantibody production, B cell hyperactivity and hypergammaglobulinaemia (increased levels of circulating γ-globulins) observed in RA are mediated by high levels of sCD23.@ Page 282. Armant teaches that sCD23 has multiple IgE-independent biological activities including costimulation of IL-2 or IL-12-induced IFN-γ production and direct triggering of TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-6 release by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Page 1005. Armant suggests that AsCD23 is a proinflammatory cytokine that, in addition, may play an important role in the control of the immune response via the enhancement of IFN-γ production.@ Abstract. The examiner concludes that A[o]ne with ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to treat arthritis by administering anti-CD23 antibodies because [Bansal teaches] that soluble CD23 levels are elevated in rheumatoid arthritis and that hypergammaglobulinaemia . . . may be mediated by high levels of soluble CD23 with the expectation that the administration of anti-CD23 would downregulate the hypergammaglobulinaemia . . . in rheumatoid arthritis patients and downregulate the inflammatory process in autoimmune diseases by inhibiting the sCD23 induced release of mediators of the inflammatory process as taught by Armant.@ Answer, page 7. However, appellant cites Bansal as evidence that the nature of the relationshipPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007