Appeal No. 2000-1787
Application No. 08/646,735
PCMCIA PCB as now claimed. Thus, the rejection of claims 7
through 9 cannot be sustained.
In summary, this panel of the board has:
not sustained the rejection of claim 8 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite;
sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 3 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Hargis;
sustained the rejection of claim 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Hargis in view of Beers;
not sustained the rejection of claims 5 and 6 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hargis in view of
Sarma; and
not sustained the rejection of claims 7 through 9 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hargis in view of
Beers.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007