Ex Parte ENDICOTT et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1973                                                        
          Application 08/890,906                                                      

               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          rejection of claims 2-6 and 12-22. 2  Claims 7-11 are objected to           
          as depending from a rejected claim.                                         
               We reverse.                                                            
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The invention relates to an apparatus and method for                   
          enforcing encapsulation of an object having object data and at              
          least one object method program, by restricting access to the               
          object data to only authorized method programs including the at             
          least one object method program.                                            
               Claim 2 is reproduced below.                                           
               2.  A data protection apparatus, said data protection                  
               apparatus comprising:                                                  
                    a first object, said first object being stored on a               
               computer system;                                                       
                    first object data and a first at least one method                 
               program associated with said first object; and                         
                    a storage protection mechanism which enforces                     
               encapsulation of said first object, said storage protection            
               mechanism enforcing encapsulation by restricting access to             
               said first object data   to only first authorized method               
               programs, said first authorized method programs being a set            
               of method programs which includes at least one method                  
               program, said first method program being included in said              
               first authorized method programs.                                      



          2  These claims in their present form were finally rejected                 
          in parent Application 08/336,581 (Paper No. 5) and were rejected            
          in this application (Paper No. 5).  Thus, the claims have been              
          twice rejected and the appeal is proper under 35 U.S.C. § 134.              
                                        - 2 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007