Appeal No. 2000-2067
Application No. 08/859,278
Hirota 5,177,623 Jan. 05, 1993
Cohen-Skalli et al. 5,235,674 Aug. 10, 1993
(Cohen-Skalli)
Kajitani et al. 5,572,337 Nov. 05, 1996
(Kajitani)
Rejections at Issue
Claims 1, 2, 4, 7 through 17 and 20 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cohen-Skalli, Kawamata
and Hirota. Claims 3 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Cohen-Skalli, Kawamata, Hirota, Miller
and Kajitani. Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Cohen-Skalli, Kawamata, Hirota and Enoki.
Claims 18, 19, 21 and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Cohen-Skalli and Hirota. Claim 23 stands
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cohen-
Skalli and Kawamata.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the
Examiner, we make reference to the Brief1 and the Answer for the
respective details thereof.
1
1 Appellants filed an Appeal Brief on March 17, 2000. In
response to an order for compliance, Appellants filed a
supplement to the Appeal Brief on February 21, 2002.
33
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007