Ex Parte ROSENBERG - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the               
          Board.                                                                        
                                                              Paper No. 29              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                         
                                      __________                                        
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                        
                             Ex parte BURTON A. ROSENBERG                               
                                      __________                                        
                                 Appeal No. 2000-2074                                   
                                Application 09/178,070                                  
                                      ___________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                         
                                      ___________                                       
          Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                    
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                 
          claims 1-22.1                                                                 
               The invention relates to an identification system.  The                  
          system includes counterparts; some of the counterparts (26) are               
          attached to things (24); a counterpart (16,18), which has a known             
               1                                                                        
               1 Appellant included claim 23 in the Appendix of the Reply               
          Brief, Paper No. 25, filed November 29, 2001.  Since Appellant                
          canceled claim 23 in Paper No. 7, filed on July 15, 1999, it is               
          not part of the appeal.                                                       
                                           1                                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007