Ex Parte KAPPELE et al - Page 13




              Appeal No. 2000-2149                                                                      13               
              Application No. 08/859,901                                                                                 

                     Based upon the above reasons, and those set forth in the answer, we have                            
              determined that the examiner has established a prima facie case of obviousness.  Upon                      

              reconsideration of all the evidence and arguments submitted by appellants, we have                         
              determined from the totality of the record that the preponderance of the evidence weighs in                
              favor of obviousness within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103.  See In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d                   

              1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992).                                                         
                                                   DECISION                                                              
              The rejection of claims 1, 3, 8 through 10, 20, 29 and 33 through 34 under                                 
              35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shimizu or Imagawa is affirmed.                              
                      The rejection of claim 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                      

              Shimizu or Imagawa is reversed.                                                                            
              The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                                                          






















Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007