The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte LEONID GROSSMAN
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-2193
Application No. 08/877,465
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 18. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 7),
claims 1, 7 and 14 were amended, and claims 3, 10, 12 and 15 were
canceled.1 Accordingly, claims 1, 2, 4 through 9, 11, 13, 14 and
16 through 18 remain before us on appeal.
1 As a result of the cancellation of claims 3 and 10, claims
4 through 6 and 11 now improperly depend from canceled claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007