Ex Parte GROSSMAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-2193                                                        
          Application No. 08/877,465                                                  


               The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for             
          tagging an encapsulated packet that is sent from one end station            
          to another end station in a computer network.  In the                       
          encapsulated packet, the tag is provided between two media                  
          headers.                                                                    
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    1.  A method for achieving effective communication                
               across a media of data transmission in a computer network,             
               the computer network including a plurality of end stations,            
               a portion of the plurality end stations lacking operating              
               system support for the media, the method comprising:                   
                    providing an encapsulated packet from one end                     
               station of the portion of the plurality of end stations;               
                    utilizing a tag as an indicator of encapsulation                  
               within the encapsulated packet; and                                    
                    providing the tag between a media header and a                    
               known media header in the encapsulated packet.                         
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Edsall et al. (Edsall)   5,742,604                Apr. 21, 1998             
                                                  (filed Mar. 28, 1996)               
          Hyden et al. (Hyden)     5,774,461                Jun. 30, 1998             
                                                  (filed Sep. 27, 1995)               
               Claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 11 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by Edsall.                                    



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007