Appeal No. 2000-2207
Application No. 08/968,379
Accordingly, since we are of the opinion that the prior art
applied by the Examiner does not support the obviousness
rejection, we do not sustain the rejection of independent claims
23, 27, and 38, nor of claims 24-26, 30, 37, 39, 40, 42, and
43 dependent thereon. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner
rejecting claims 23-27, 30, 37-40, 42, and 43 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MAHSHID D. SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007