Appeal No. 2000-2247 Application 08/137,189 The range is 16 positions in the horizontal and vertical directions (-8 to +7 pixels from the center of the block, col. 5, lines 10-13, which includes 0 pixel displacement) for a total of 2 16 tests to find the best match in the prior frame odd field and 2 16 tests to find the best match in the prior frame even field (col. 5, lines 13-16). Because a block is 8x8 pixels, this range compares a current block to blocks in the vicinity of the current block in prior frame fields (as compared to the embodiment of figure 3 which compares a block to a block at the same location in the prior frame fields). However, this embodiment also does not compare a current block of the current frame to reconstructed neighboring blocks of the current frame, as claimed. The Examiner relies on "the motion compensation circuit of figure 8 as incorporated into the encoder of figure 4" (EA5). The Examiner's reasoning is somewhat lengthy and convoluted, but basically the Examiner finds that the frame memories contain reconstructed current frames and interprets elements 134 and 136 in figure 8 to be memories that hold reconstructed current and preceding frames (EA5-7). Appellants argue, inter alia: (1) there is no suggestion toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007