Ex Parte HELOT et al - Page 2



            Appeal No. 2001-0004                                                      
            Application No. 08/961,580                                                

            mobile computing device are formed on the same surface of                 
            the mobile computing device.                                              
                 Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and                
            it reads as follows:                                                      
                 1.  A docking station, comprising:                                   
                 a docking station body having a replicated port                      
                 formed in at least a first wall thereof;                             
                 a receiving port electrically coupled to said                        
                 replicated port, wherein said receiving port is capable              
                 of interfacing to a docking port on a mobile computing               
                 device having a housing and a keyboard on a first                    
                 surface of the housing, wherein said docking port on                 
                 said mobile computing device is formed on same said                  
                 first surface of said housing as said keyboard; and                  
                 means coupled between said docking station body and                  
                 said receiving port the [sic, that] permits movement of              
                 said receiving port relative to said replicated port.                
                 The references relied on by the examiner are:                        
            Ma                       5,290,178            Mar.  1, 1994               
            Leman et al. (Leman)     5,436,792            Jul. 25, 1995               
            Ditzik                   5,668,570            Sep. 16, 1997               
                 Claims 1 through 3 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
            § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Leman in view of Ma.                  
                 Claims 4 through 6 and 8 through 15 stand rejected                   
            under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Leman in              
            view of Ma and Ditzik.                                                    

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007