The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GARY J. SECKEL
_____________
Appeal No. 2001-0019
Application No. 09/240,197
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-10, 16 and 21-26. Claims 11-15 and 17-20,
the only other claims currently pending in the application, have
been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not
being readable on the elected species.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a multi-purpose, trailer
mounted, farm apparatus comprising means for forming bales, means
for splitting logs, and a hydraulic system for operating the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007