Appeal No. 2001-0019
Application No. 09/240,197
Since the evidence relied upon by the examiner would not
have been suggestive of the content of, in particular claims 1,
7 and 24, the examiner’s rejection of these claims, as well as
claims 2-6, 8-10, 16, 21-23, 25 and 26 that depend therefrom,
must be reversed.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
LJS:hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007