The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte MAKOTO HIJIKATA ________________ Appeal No. 2001-0027 Application 09/110,397 ________________ HEARD: FEBRUARY 7, 2002 ________________ Before JERRY SMITH, DIXON and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 5, 7 through 9, 11, 12, 14, 16 and 17. Claims 1 through 4 have been canceled while claims 6, 10, 13, 15 and 18 have been allowed by the Examiner. We reverse. BACKGROUND Appellant’s invention is directed to an on-vehicle navigation system that considers the user’s run experiencePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007