Appeal No. 2001-0034 Application 08/944,807 The sole reference cited in the final rejection against the claims is: White et al. (White) Re. 36,186 Apr. 6, 1999 Claims 1, 4, 6, 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over White. White pertains to “[a] control system for controlling automatic shifting of a manual/automatic transmission . . . including a cruise control system and an auto-shift mode for controlling automatic upshift and downshift operations between the top two gears of a heavy duty truck transmission” (abstract). In rejecting the appealed claims as being unpatentable over White, the examiner notes several of the similarities between the system of White and that of the claims, including, a semiautomatic transmission having a number of manually selectable gear ratios and a number of automatically selectable gear ratios, a memory unit including a software algorithm for controlling shifting between the number of automatically selectable gear ratios, and a control computer for switching between an operational mode wherein the transmission is shifted between the automatically selectable gear ratios under the control of the 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007