The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte M. ALLEN NORTHRUP, YUN-TAI HSUEH, AND ROSEMARY L. SMITH __________ Appeal No. 2001-00621 Application 08/774,170 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, GARRIS, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1-5, 11, 14-17 and 24. Claims 6-10, 12, 13, and 18-23 are said to be allowable if rewritten in independent form to include all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. (Examiner’s Answer, page 2, lines 8-11). 1 This appeal is related to appeal no. 2001-0103 of application 08/763,465.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007